Half a day of LOP
- 16 Sep
- Half day
because no half-day leave or regularisation filed before the cutoff on 20 Sep
- LOP days
- 0.5
because the payroll window is 26 Aug – 25 Sep, and only this day was short
- Paid days
- 29.5 of 30
- Salary not paid
- ₹293
Loss of pay · guide · updated 6 Oct 2026, checked by the LekhaHR team
Paid days are the days in the month less LOP days, and the salary follows them. How much one day costs depends on the divisor your policy names. Since 21 Nov 2025, the Code on Wages, s.20, caps it: a deduction for absence can be no more than the share of wages the days absent bear to the days the person was required to work.
LekhaHR runs attendance, leave and payroll for small Indian teams from ₹59 per employee a month (₹99 for the first 25), payroll included, no minimum: it counts LOP days from the attendance month and shows the deduction with its working on the payslip.
Key facts
because LOP is the one deduction people notice before they read anything else on the slip.
because no half-day leave or regularisation filed before the cutoff on 20 Sep
because the payroll window is 26 Aug – 25 Sep, and only this day was short
Design preview · sample data · Paiteq Technologies
Deduction for absence · Code on Wages, 2019, s.20 (deductions for absence from duty) · in force 21 Nov 2025 · reviewed 6 Oct 2026
No. 01
When it applies
LOP applies to a day the person was expected to work, did not, and had no paid leave to cover. Joining or leaving mid-month is different: that salary is simply paid for the days of employment, and nothing is marked as LOP. These are the usual cases, each a line your attendance and leave policy should name.
because once the paid leave of every type the person may use is exhausted, an approved day off is still a day off, but an unpaid one. Many policies ask the person to choose LOP on the request, so it is never a surprise.
because an unapproved absence has no paid leave behind it. Give the person a chance to apply first: a day marked absent is often a leave request someone forgot to send.
because the attendance policy says how many hours make a full day and a half day. Paiteq's sample rule: a full day is 8 h on the clock, less breaks, and a half day is from 4 h, under 8 h. A true short day is covered by half a day of leave, not by regularisation; with no leave applied, it is half a day of LOP.
because a day with a missing punch stays short until the person files a regularisation before the cutoff. After payroll locks, a correction is paid back next month as an arrear.
because s.20 allows a deduction for the part of a day actually missed, in proportion. Three 15-minute late arrivals support about 45 minutes of pay, not half a day. Anything more is a fine, which s.19 allows only for acts on a government-approved list, after a displayed notice and a chance to explain, and within 3% of the month's wages. Have a lawyer read any such rule before it applies.
Most LOP starts as a leave question. Showing the balance before a request is sent, as a leave management system does, lets people choose paid leave while they still have it. The leave rules guide covers earned, casual and sick leave, and the attendance regularisation guide covers missed punches.
No. 02
The daily rate
Monthly pay ÷ a divisor × LOP days. Four divisors are common, and your policy must say which one you use. On Rohan's ₹17,600 a month and half a day of LOP in September, they give these answers. The working-days figure is also the most s.20 allows.
because every day of the month is a paid day, weekly offs and holidays included, so one day is the month's pay ÷ days in the month. It moves with the month: 28 to 31.
because some policies treat every month as 30 days. It is simple, but it has a trap at each end: in February, a person absent every working day is still paid for 2 days; in a 31-day month, a deduction for 31 LOP days would exceed the salary. Write both down: a month with no day worked or on paid leave pays nothing, and LOP never exceeds the month's pay.
because only the days the person was required to work are counted. This is the largest deduction s.20 allows: a day absent can cost at most the month's pay ÷ the days required to work.
because 26 is roughly a month less four Sundays. It stays inside the s.20 limit when a month has 26 or fewer working days, and can over-deduct in a month with more.
because the policy, the appointment letter or the salary structure should say which divisor applies, and payroll should use it every month without exception.
because weekly offs and holidays are paid days, so a day of LOP is the smallest slice of the month. The exception is February, where 1/28 is more than a fixed 1/30. It is the easiest method to explain on a payslip.
because with only Sundays off, a 31-day month can have 27 working days. Then 1/26 is more than 1/27, and the deduction runs past the s.20 limit.
Design preview · sample data · Paiteq Technologies
| Month | Calendar days | Fixed 30 | Working days, the s.20 most | Fixed 26 | Whole month away, fixed 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 202728 days · 20 working | ₹628.57 | ₹586.67 | ₹880.00 | ₹676.92 | still pays ₹1,173 |
| September 202630 days · 21 working | ₹586.67 | ₹586.67 | ₹838.10 | ₹676.92 | pays ₹0 |
| August 202631 days · 21 working | ₹567.74 | ₹586.67 | ₹838.10 | ₹676.92 | deducts ₹587 more than the salary |
In February 2027 a day on calendar days (₹628.57) costs more than on a fixed 30 (₹586.67). A whole month away on a fixed 30 still pays ₹1,173 in February and deducts ₹587 more than the salary in August 2026, which is why a fixed-30 policy needs both limits written in. Working days are Paiteq's Monday-to-Friday week less its sample holidays.
Design preview · sample data · Paiteq Technologies
“Loss of pay. A day of absence not covered by approved paid leave is one day of loss of pay; a half day under the attendance policy is half a day. Each earning component is paid for the paid days, worked out as the monthly amount × (calendar days in the month − LOP days) ÷ calendar days in the month. Weekly offs and holidays are paid days and are never counted as LOP. Attendance is read up to the payroll cutoff; an absence after it is settled in the next month's salary.”
This is Paiteq's sample policy, and the one Rohan's ₹293 comes from. If you choose working days instead, replace “calendar days in the month” with “working days in the month” in both places.
Code on Wages, 2019, s.20 (deductions for absence from duty) · in force 21 Nov 2025 · reviewed 6 Oct 2026
No. 03
Worked example
Rohan Das is a customer success associate at Paiteq, paid ₹17,600 a month. On 16 Sep he left at 14:30 for a personal errand. That was a true record, so there was nothing to regularise; half a day of casual leave would have covered it, but he applied for none before the cutoff, so September carries 0.5 day of LOP. Paiteq's sample policy uses calendar days, so each salary component is paid for 29.5 of 30 days.
because ₹8,000 × 29.5 ÷ 30
because ₹3,000 × 29.5 ÷ 30
because ₹5,000 × 29.5 ÷ 30
because ₹1,600 × 29.5 ÷ 30
because ₹17,600 for a full month, less ₹293 of LOP
because 12% of ₹10,817 Code wages paid; ₹1,320 in a month with no LOP
because 0.75% of ₹10,817, rounded up; ₹83 with no LOP
because the person was not paid for the day at all. Prorating basic alone, and paying the allowances in full, is a second, unwritten LOP rule.
because each line is rounded to the rupee and the gross is their sum, so the slip adds up when someone checks it with a calculator.
because the salary month is 1 to 30 Sep, but attendance after the cutoff is read in October's run. A late absence is settled next month, never guessed.
Design preview · sample data · Paiteq Technologies
This is the same September slip the payroll software page shows, where paid days come from attendance once it locks. Check PF and ESI on your own figures with the PF calculator and the ESI calculator.
No. 04
PF, ESI and PT
Yes, in plain proportion. PF and ESI are worked out on the wages actually paid for the month, so LOP lowers the employee's and the employer's share together. Nothing about the person's membership changes.
because PF is on the Code wages actually paid, up to the wage ceiling. In Rohan's month it fell from ₹1,320 to ₹1,298.
because ESI contributions are on the wages paid for the month, rounded up. Coverage is tested on monthly wages against the ₹21,000 ceiling, so a month with LOP does not take anyone in or out of ESI.
because in states that slab PT by the month's salary, a large LOP can move the month into a lower slab. Read the slab on the gross actually paid.
because s.18 caps all deductions in a wage period at 50% of the wages, and lists absence among them. How LOP counts towards that cap is not settled, so the safe course is to work out the month's earned wages after LOP, keep every other deduction within half of that figure, and move a loan instalment that does not fit to the next month.
Deductions · Code on Wages, 2019, s.18 (deductions which may be made from wages) · in force 21 Nov 2025 · reviewed 6 Oct 2026
No. 05
On the payslip
Show the days, then the money. A wage slip is a legal duty for every employer under the Code on Wages, s.50, and the clearest one carries three numbers in the employee block: days in the month, LOP days and paid days. Each earning then shows the amount for the paid days. Wages for a monthly period are due by the 7th of the next month, so LOP has to be settled before then.
because the divisor your policy uses is shown, not assumed
because 16 Sep: no half-day leave or regularisation filed before the cutoff on 20 Sep
because paid days plus LOP days equal the days in the month
because the clearest Indian slips show two columns, the monthly rate and the amount earned for the paid days, so LOP is visible without a negative line. If you show a separate LOP deduction instead, PF and ESI must still be on the earned figure, never the full rate.
because the person cannot match it to their attendance; name the day or the window
because a half day is half a day of LOP, never a full one
The free salary slip format carries these three fields and works out paid days from LOP days, and the monthly attendance sheet counts LOP from the month's codes.
No. 06
LOP reversal
LOPR is loss of pay reversal: days cut as LOP in an earlier month that turn out to be wrong, now paid back. A missed punch approved after payroll locked is the usual cause. The reversal is paid as an arrear at the daily rate of the month the day belonged to, with PF and ESI on the arrear; the earlier payslip is not re-issued.
because 16 Sep was a half day with no leave applied before the cutoff
because, in this example, the half day is approved as on duty after September's payroll locked
because September's pay for the half day: ₹17,600 × 0.5 ÷ 30, each component rounded
because an arrear is wages for the month it is paid in
Design preview · sample data · Paiteq Technologies. Rohan’s actual 16 Sep was a true early exit, so this card is an “if”.
No. 07
Questions
LOP means loss of pay: the salary not paid for days a person was absent without paid leave. It is written on the payslip as LOP days, and paid days are the days in the month less those LOP days. Leave without pay (LWP) is worked out the same way.
Divide the monthly pay by the divisor your policy names (calendar days, a fixed 30, working days or a fixed 26) and multiply by the LOP days. Under the Code on Wages, 2019, s.20, in force since 21 Nov 2025, the deduction may not exceed the share of wages that the days absent bear to the days the person was required to work.
It is the rupee amount taken off for the LOP days: the monthly pay ÷ your divisor × LOP days. On Paiteq's sample slip, Rohan Das has 0.5 day of LOP in a 30-day September on a ₹17,600 monthly gross, so the LOP value is ₹293 and his gross falls from ₹17,600 to ₹17,307. Many slips print only the LOP days and prorate each component instead; the total comes to the same figure.
LOP is the days deducted this month. LOPR is LOP reversal: days deducted in an earlier month that turned out to be wrong, now paid back as an arrear at that month's daily rate. No. 06 on this page, “LOP reversal, explained”, works one through on Rohan's half day.
On the calendar-day method, weekly offs and holidays are paid days, so only absent working days are LOP. Many companies add a rule that a weekly off between two LOP days is also LOP, so that someone absent for a whole week is not paid for the weekend. Test any such rule against s.20: the month's deduction may not exceed the monthly wages × days absent ÷ days the person was required to work. For a long absence the weekend rule usually stays inside that limit; for a Friday and a Monday it usually goes over, because 4 days at 1/30 is more than 2 days at 1/21. If you use the rule, cap each month's LOP at the s.20 figure, and have a lawyer read the clause against your state's weekly-holiday rule.
Yes. Both are worked out on the wages actually paid for the month, so when LOP lowers the wages, the employee's and the employer's PF and ESI fall with them. ESI coverage itself is tested on the monthly wages, so a month with LOP does not change whether someone is covered.
There are two defensible policies. In the first, the day is marked LOP and the person may apply leave until the cutoff. In the second, an absence with no leave applied is adjusted against casual leave, then earned leave, before any LOP. The second produces far fewer payslip disputes and is the better default, because casual leave lapses at the year end anyway; the first leaves the choice with the employee, which matters to someone saving earned leave. Whichever you choose, write the order of leave types into the policy and show the reason on the day: “adjusted against casual leave, because no leave was applied by 20 Sep”.
From basic and from every other monthly component, in the same proportion, not from basic alone. Rohan's 0.5 day of LOP in September cuts his basic, HRA, special allowance and conveyance each by 29.5 ÷ 30, which is how his gross falls by ₹293. Taking the whole deduction from basic shrinks the base for PF and pays allowances for a day nobody worked; prorating basic alone and paying the allowances in full is the opposite mistake. Reimbursements against bills, such as a phone bill, are not salary for a day, so they are paid as claimed.
LOP in the last month does not lower gratuity, because gratuity is worked on the rate of wages last drawn, not on the smaller amount paid in a month with LOP. The 15/26 formula works on the full monthly wages: from 21 Nov 2025 that means Code wages, including the 50% add-back, so someone who leaves with 4 LOP days in their final month gets gratuity on their full monthly figure, not on the prorated slip. Whether LOP days cut the service is a separate question. Absence, leave and sickness usually count as continuous service; the risk is a long unauthorised absence that the employer formally treated as a break in service under its standing orders. That matters most near the 5-year qualifying line, or the 1-year line for a fixed-term employee, so check those cases with a lawyer. The gratuity calculator on this site works the amount from the monthly wages and the years.
In the arithmetic, yes: both are days not paid. The difference is discipline. LWP approved in advance, say for a family emergency after leave has run out, is an authorised absence. LOP for days nobody approved is unauthorised absence, and a run of it is where “report back to work” letters start. Keep the two codes apart in attendance even though payroll treats them the same, and follow the notice steps in your standing orders or appointment letter before treating anyone as having left.
Yes. LOP days are not days worked, so for the workers the OSH Code covers they do not count towards the 180 days a worker needs in the calendar year to earn annual leave, or towards the 1 day earned for every 20 worked. In the notice period, some companies extend the last day by the LOP days and others recover the shortfall as notice pay; either needs the appointment letter to say so before anyone resigns, and a lawyer should read that clause.
No. 08
Sources
The divisor is your policy's choice; the limit on it is the Code's. State rules can add detail, so check the state where the person works.
Checked by the LekhaHR team · reviewed 6 Oct 2026 · next review by 31 Dec 2026. This guide explains the rule; it is not legal advice for your establishment.
For employersLekhaHR is HR and payroll software for small Indian teams. See payroll →